Strengthening of the Rule of Law

A/RES/52/125View PDF

Who adopted this document and its mandates?

A Resolution of the General Assembly, under agenda items 112 Human rights questions and 112b Human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms, published in 1998.

What other versions does this mandate have?

7 versions · 1995–2003

This is an older version — the most recent is A/RES/57/221

Year	Symbol	Title	Word length	Text similarity
2003	A/RES/57/221	Strengthening of the rule of law	910	87%Compare
2001	A/RES/55/99	Strengthening of the rule of law	839	74%Compare
1999	A/RES/53/142	Strengthening of the rule of law	811	78%Compare
1998	A/RES/52/125	Strengthening of the rule of law	758	65%Compare
1997	A/RES/51/96	Strengthening of the rule of law	795	74%Compare

Which reports were submitted under this mandate?

1 report · 2004

Year	Symbol	Title		Mandate resolution
2004	A/59/402	Strengthening of the rule of law report of the Secretary-General		A/RES/57/221

What subjects does this mandate have?

5 subjects

Coordination Within UN System Financial Assistance Human Rights Advancement Rule of Law Technical Cooperation

What’s in this document?

11 operative paragraphs

Takes note with satisfaction of the report of the Secretary-General;⁵

⁵A/52/475.

Praises the efforts made by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to accomplish its ever-increasing tasks with the limited financial and personnel resources at its disposal;

Expresses its deep concern at the scarcity of means at the disposal of the Office of the High Commissioner for the fulfilment of its tasks;

Notes that the United Nations Programme of Advisory Services and Technical Assistance in the Field of Human Rights does not have sufficient funds to provide any substantial financial assistance to national projects that have a direct impact on the realization of human rights and the maintenance of the rule of law in countries that are committed to those ends but that face economic hardship;

Affirms that the Office of the High Commissioner remains the focal point for coordinating system-wide attention on human rights, democracy and the rule of law;

Welcomes the deepening of the ongoing dialogue initiated by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights with other relevant bodies and programmes of the United Nations system, with a view to enhancing system-wide coordination of assistance in human rights, democracy and the rule of law;

Encourages the High Commissioner to continue this dialogue, taking into account the need to explore new synergies with other organs and agencies of the United Nations system with a view to obtaining increased financial assistance for human rights and the rule of law;

Also encourages the High Commissioner to continue to explore the possibility of further contact with and support of financial institutions, acting within their mandates, with a view to obtaining technical and financial means to strengthen the capacity of the Office of the High Commissioner to provide assistance to national projects aiming at the realization of human rights and the maintenance of the rule of law;

Requests the High Commissioner to accord high priority to the technical cooperation activities undertaken by the Office of the High Commissioner with regard to the rule of law;

Takes note with appreciation of the proposal contained in the report of the Secretary-General that an analysis be undertaken of technical cooperation provided by the United Nations in the field of human rights with the aim of formulating recommendations for inter-agency coordination, funding and allocation of responsibilities in order to improve efficiency and complementarity of action concerning, inter alia, assistance to States in strengthening the rule of law;

Requests the Secretary-General to submit a report to the General Assembly at its fifty-third session on the results of the contacts established in accordance with the present resolution, as well as on any other developments pertaining to the implementation of the above-mentioned recommendation of the World Conference on Human Rights.

Who adopted this document and its mandates?

What other versions does this mandate have?

Which reports were submitted under this mandate?

What subjects does this mandate have?

What’s in this document?

Table of contents