Integrity of the Judicial System

A/HRC/RES/25/4No PDF available

Who created this mandate?

A Resolution of the General Assembly, under agenda item 3Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, published in 2014.

What other versions does this mandate have?

4 versions · 2012–2018

This is an older version — the most recent is A/HRC/RES/37/3

2018A/HRC/RES/37/3Integrity of the judicial systemLatestCompare with previous version
2016A/HRC/RES/31/2Integrity of the judicial systemCompare with previous version
2014A/HRC/RES/25/4Integrity of the judicial systemCompare with previous version
2012A/HRC/RES/19/31Integrity of the judicial system

Versions are identified automatically by matching titles within the same organ (~97% accuracy on a manual audit).

What subjects does this mandate have?

7 topics

Administration of Justice Consultations Equality Before the Law Judicial Independence Judicial System Military Courts Right to a Fair Trial

What does this mandate say?

16 operative paragraphs

Takes note of the report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers on the administration of justice through military tribunals submitted to the General Assembly at its sixty-eighth session;

Also takes note of conclusions and recommendations made by the Special Rapporteur in her report, in particular that military tribunals, when they exist, must be an integral part of the general justice system and operate in accordance with human rights standards, including by respecting the right to a fair trial and due process of law guarantees;

Reaffirms the right of everyone to recognition everywhere as a person before the law;

Reiterates that, as declared in article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, every person is entitled, in full equality, to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal duly established by law, in the determination of his/her rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him/her, and that he/she is entitled to the presumption of innocence until proved guilty according to law;

Notes that, according to paragraph 5 of the Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, everyone has the right to be tried by ordinary courts or tribunals using established legal procedures, and that tribunals that do not use duly established procedures of the legal process shall not be created to displace the jurisdiction belonging to the ordinary courts or judicial tribunals;

Underlines that any court trying a person charged with a criminal offence should be competent, independent and impartial;

Urges States to guarantee that all persons brought to trial before courts or tribunals under their authority have the right to be tried in their presence, to defend themselves in person or through legal assistance of their own choosing and to have all the guarantees necessary for their legal defence;

Calls upon States to ensure that the principles of equality before the courts and before the law are respected within their judicial systems by, inter alia, providing to those being tried the possibility to examine, or to have examined, the witnesses against them and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on their behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against them;

Reaffirms that every convicted person should have the right to have his/her conviction and sentence reviewed by a tribunal of competent, independent and impartial jurisdiction according to law;

Calls upon States that have military courts or special tribunals for trying criminal offenders to ensure that such bodies are integral part of the general judicial system and that such courts apply procedures that are recognized according to international law as guarantees of a fair trial, including the right to appeal a conviction and a sentence;

Stresses the importance of developing cooperation between national judicial systems with a view to, inter alia, strengthening the protection of persons deprived of their liberty;

Requests the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to convene prior to the twenty-eighth session of the Human Rights Council an expert consultation with the participation of representatives of States, the special procedures, including the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, the chairperson-rapporteurs of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances and the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, the treaty bodies and regional human rights mechanisms, as well as non-governmental organizations and national human rights institutions for an exchange of views on human rights considerations relating to the issues of administration of justice through military tribunals and the role of the integral judicial system in combating human rights violations;

Also requests the High Commissioner to provide all the assistance and support necessary for the expert consultation;

Further requests the High Commissioner to present a summary of the discussions held during the expert consultation to the Human Rights Council at its twenty-eighth session;

Invites the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers to take full account of the present resolution in the discharge of her mandate;

Decides to continue consideration of this issue in accordance with its annual programme of work.

Paragraph content is machine-extracted from UN documents. For authoritative content, please refer to the official UN document.

No headings found in this document.

Who created this mandate?

What other versions does this mandate have?

What subjects does this mandate have?

What does this mandate say?

Table of contents